Home Blog Andrew Yang Describes School for Too Many Children as "Daily Low Grade...

Andrew Yang Describes School for Too Many Children as “Daily Low Grade Psychic Beatings.”

Education voters—people for whom education is the issue that determines their vote— have been banging our heads against the wall forever during presidential campaigns. Sure, the average American voter has included education in their list of the most important policy issues for decades. But despite America’s collective believe that education is a priority, very few voters actually vote on it and that has allowed presidential candidates to ignore it, pedal in popular and unworkable soundbites, or hold straight up terrible positions on the subject and get away with it. 

Andrew Yang is not peddling in soundbites or the ridiculous—in fact, he is the only candidate willing to say that he supports good schools regardless of what kind of school they are. It’s sad that his measured position is considered by some as controversial but fidelity to systems, however broken, has long overridden the needs of children in American politics.

Presidential candidate Andrew Yang was a guest on Eric Weinstein‘s podcast, The Portal. Eric Weinstein is a mathematical physicist, economist, and the managing director of Thiel Capital. During their conversation, they discussed a massively important education issue that no other candidate has touched, let alone talked about at length in the smart and honest way that these two men did. 

Weinstein raises the issue of demographic groups that emerge as voting blocks—he asserts that one important and totally ignored group consists of “parents of super smart kids who have some kind of a learning difference that causes them to wildly underperform in school.” 

Yang emphatically agrees. Weinstein admits he was that kid. Yang responds that he is that parent. Yang goes on to talk about how his son, who has autism, has tried various schooling environments and that the struggles during that process have been “sharp. 

Yang continues on to say that “our institutions aren’t well designed for people with different learning profiles or different approaches to the world.” And he acknowledges the luxury that both he and Weinstein enjoy in having the means—and therefore the freedom—to choose the best schools for their children.

Weinstein recollects his own time as a student—every conference was him listening to teachers tell his parents, “Eric is underperforming, Eric can’t meet his potential.” Weinstein goes on to say “you don’t realize how much damage you’re doing to maybe as much as ⅕ of the population.” Yang responds that he’s heard this very phenomenon described as “regular low grade psychic beatings.” 

Weinstein asserts that kids are sustaining more and more trauma every year and he describes the consequence as a “maddening loss of human brilliance.” He also employs the term “teaching disabilities” to describe the way in which we have utterly failed those who “don’t fit into the notion of what can be educated by one teacher teaching a room of 20 people to make the economics work.”

And then he uses the word “despair” to describe these parents that make up this not-so- hypothetical demographic:

”I want to talk to all of the parents who are leading lives of despair saying, ‘why is my kid wildly underperforming and I know how smart this kid is?’

Hallelujah (and thank you) is all I can say. It is high time a presidential candidate stop ignoring the parents and children who are being traumatized by the American school system. Despair is precisely what millions of parents—and children—feel. Andrew Yang is willing to say that our institutions, and specifically the public school system, aren’t well designed for a sizable portion of the population. 

Ok, Mr. Yang. The next question for you is what can we do about that?

What Do You Think?
Erika Sanzi
Erika Sanzi is a former educator and elected school committee member and the chief editor of this site, Project Forever Free. She is also a senior visiting fellow at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. She blogs at Good School Hunting and occasionally writes for other outlets including Scary Mommy, The 74, and The Hill. She is the mother of three school aged sons who currently attend a district school, a charter school, and a private school—in 3 different zip codes! Rhode Island is home.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Here’s Why Our Kids Need to Get Back to Class

It’s now July and one-half of the year is behind us.  That half was filled with Australian wildfires, presidential impeachments and subsequent...

Mom Crowd Funds the Scholarship Her Son with Autism Lost Because of the Pandemic

I stumbled upon the story of Gabe and he pretty much captured my heart. You'll soon see why. I reached out to...

Frederick Douglass’ Speech: What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?

We based the name of this site, Project Forever Free, on these words by Frederick Douglass: "Once you...

Three Mothers Win Supreme Court Case that May Now Expand Education Options for Families Across the Country

In an effort to secure the best education possible for their children, three mothers launched a court case five years ago that...

Huge Win for Kids and Religious Liberty

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision today in Espinoza v. Montana finally puts a stake in the heart of the ugly and bigoted legacy of the Blaine...