Home Blog Teachers’ Unions Try to Thwart Education Access at a Most Inopportune Time

Teachers’ Unions Try to Thwart Education Access at a Most Inopportune Time

With millions of students at home as the result of coronavirus district closures, and families finding themselves thrown into “unexpected homeschooling,” Americans rightly expect that teachers, administrators and principals at all types of schools would be embracing an “all hands on deck” approach to this challenging situation.

But while instances of cooperation between public and private schools, charters and virtual academies abound, unfortunately, so does the continuation of education politics as usual.

The Wall Street Journal reports that, “under pressure from the unions,” the Oregon Department of Education is now preventing students from transferring to the state’s virtual public charter schools. Many families in Oregon sought to enroll their children in virtual charter schools when the brick-and-mortar public schools closed their doors on March 16.

But the Oregon Education Association convinced the state to halt any further transfers to virtual charter school, blocking enrollment of 1,600 students at Oregon Connections Academy alone.

There’s more hopeful news out of Alaska. Students there could soon be the beneficiaries of a partnership between their state and the Florida Virtual School. The online provider has signed a contract to offer courses to Alaskan students who cannot access their now shuttered public schools, the Anchorage Daily News reports.

As Alaska Education Commissioner Michael Johnson put it, “While the world around us is scrambling with uncertainty, I believe our students and teachers can and will re-imagine teaching and learning.”

Johnson’s right. Yet the teachers’ union in Alaska is also trying to put the deep freeze on education access. It stands firmly opposed to the partnership, in part because it hasn’t been vetted by “Alaska education professionals.” The union apparently believes nothing is better than something that hasn’t been blessed by their professional “experts.”

What is really at the heart of the special interest groups’ opposition? We find a blunt answer in Alaska: the union is afraid the online learning option will remain a permanent feature of the Alaskan education landscape. And they aren’t alone.

The Los Angeles teachers’ union has successfully resisted efforts by the Los Angeles Unified School District to have teachers move instruction online during the pandemic. The Pennsylvania legislature, acting under pressure from unions, has cut off tuition for any additional enrollees at the states’ cyber charter networks, which are now scrambling to serve the surge of students for free.

The political obstacle course is all the more disappointing because this could be a time of great cooperation and cross-pollination of best practices between traditional public schools and those that, by the nature of their model, are better prepared for this disruptive crisis. Some virtual schools have offered free distance learning instruction to districts, and dozens of educational technology companies are offering their products heavily discounted or entirely gratis, but few have taken them up on the offer.

Turf wars are not the only political barrier impacting instruction during the coronavirus crisis. In states as diverse as California, Kentucky and Washington, districts are choosing not to offer instruction online at all because not every student will be able to access the lessons. Instead of finding creative ways to deliver internet services to disadvantaged families as some New York charter networks are doing, these districts are ceasing instruction for the majority of students who would otherwise be able to continue learning, ensuring that everyone falls behind.

Just as the nation faces dark weeks and months ahead, the coming year will be difficult and turbulent for students, families, teachers and schools. For the education sector, the problems will continue long after the virus is largely defeated, as school systems face large budgetary shortfalls due to reduced tax revenue. In facing these challenges, our priority should be to keep students learning as much as is possible.

Delivering continued education and support to students and families during this time will take cooperation, creativity and a heavy dose of pragmatism, not retreads of pre-crisis political debates.

This piece first ran in its original version here as education commentary for the Heritage Foundation.

What Do You Think?
Lindsey Burke and Inez Stepman
Lindsey M. Burke researches and writes on federal and state education issues as the Will Skillman fellow in education policy at The Heritage Foundation. Inez Feltscher Stepman is a senior policy analyst at the Independent Women’s Forum.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

Frederick Douglass’ Speech: What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?

We based the name of this site, Project Forever Free, on these words by Frederick Douglass: "Once you...

Three Mothers Win Supreme Court Case that May Now Expand Education Options for Families Across the Country

In an effort to secure the best education possible for their children, three mothers launched a court case five years ago that...

Huge Win for Kids and Religious Liberty

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision today in Espinoza v. Montana finally puts a stake in the heart of the ugly and bigoted legacy of the Blaine...

VIDEO: Parents Seek Low-Tech Learning Options in the Fall

If you’re a parent in the Virginia school district where Julie Gunlock sends her kids, you need to remember these words: “Not...

Just Like Cops, Teachers Often Refuse to Address the ‘Bad Apples’ in Their Profession

I’m here to say that I know that all police officers aren’t bad. In fact, troubled by the obvious, and most recent,...